The Costs of World Empire |
Americans Against World Empire Homepage
|
THE COSTS OF EMPIRE ---$29 billion for the CIA (and $50 billion for a fleet in the Persian
Gulf)--There goes our tax cut?
& DEFINING TERRORISM
by Llewellyn H. Rockwell,
Jr.
Reprinted from the Rothbard-Rockwell Report
Nearly ten years after the Cold War ends, what happens to the budget of the
CIA? Thanks to the Republicans, the agency just received the largest spending increase
from Congress in 15 years. Its official budget is now at $29 billion, which is as high as
it was at the height of the Cold War. (I say official, because black or hidden
funds are also included for the CIA in the Pentagon budget and even such agencies as
Fannie Mae.)
"About a year ago," an unidentified source told the New York Times, "the
door into the agency was almost shut" because of budget cuts. Now it has new
life. No official conservatives appear upset by this. In fact, the Weekly Standard
praised the atrocious budget agreement ($1.7 trillion) in which this spook subsidy was
embedded. The Heritage Foundation's Dan Mitchell, who has traditionally been tough on the
Republicans by Washington's standards, actually argued the budget was a step in the right
direction.
Neither mentioned this CIA budget increase, which is arguably the least justifiable aspect
of the new budget. But it appears that official conservatives will endorse anything that
bolsters the warfare state. And two weeks after the appalling budget agreement passed,
millions of conservatives marched to the polling stations to pull the levers for the usual
crop of lying Republicans.
Conservatism likes to wrap itself in a vast intellectual tradition. Burke, Weaver,
Voegelin, and on and on, and this is what it comes down to: loot more tax dollars to feed
the largest military empire ever constructed, with troops in 100 countries and spooks in
many more.
The latest excuse is the need to combat "terrorism." Would the word apply when,
say, a head of state decides on his own authority to bomb a productive capitalist medicine
factory halfway around the world without warning, killing civilians all around? Of course
not.
The word doesn't apply when the victim is a single territory. For example, Russians were
considered terrorists when they bombed Afghanistan. When the U.S. does the same, it is
"retaliation" for supposed support of terrorism.
It doesn't apply solely to people of a certain nationality. For example, Iraq is
considered a terror state for suppressing the just nationalist aspirations of the Kurds.
But when the Kurds in Turkey seek an independent state and thus defy a U.S. favored
government, they are considered terrorists.
No, the definition of terrorism is increasingly obvious. It means behavior that the U.S.
military power elite does not like on political grounds. The CIA, as the portion of the
military state that deals with espionage, is now charged with seeking out enemies wherever
it can find them, and blowing them up during critical stages in American political life.
In an echo of Pearl Harbor, recent revelations suggest that the U.S. had prior knowledge
that the embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were being targeted by opponents of U.S. middle
east policy, but did nothing about it. Recent revelations also suggest that the decision
to "retaliate" through property and life destruction was undertaken by four or
five people, without broader consultation, let alone a Congressional declaration of war as
demanded by the Constitution..
Is this not an abuse of power that conservatives should denounce? Is rewarding the
military state with ever bigger budgets a proper response to this outrageous violation of
all standards of decency?
We have here a movement that is so wedded to the military state that it will drag down
liberty, even when all excuses for empire have slipped away, just to keep it well funded.
What a disgrace that conservatism has come to mean a tacit endorsement of permanent
empire.
Courtesy of the Rothbard-Rockwell Report, published by the Center for Libertarian Studies,
PO Box 4091, Burlingame, CA 94011, $49 for 12 issues yearly,
(800) 325-7257